This tool is excellent for design and multimedia creation. Likewise, if you are reporting on something delicate, you may want to capture evidence of the work you published before other reporters added to it after your shift ended. If you are reporting on something negative, the site may quickly amend the website and any links may not show what you saw. ( Keep reading to see an even better alternative to this).
This could be especially important if the site is liable to change or be taken down.
I first used this tool to build a portfolio of all my web articles for my degree, but it has uses beyond that too.įor example, if you are investigating a website, you may want to document the site each time you look at it.
While normal screen capture tools only capture the information on the screen at the time, this tool will render a full webpage meaning you don’t have to scroll and stick screenshots together. This tool is a fantastic one for documenting pages as you see them. Some are simple and increase productivity, while others can be employed for more advanced investigations. This list contains all the tools I have used and benefitted from (in no particular order).
Some are simple, such as those which block advertising, others are more advanced, such as Grammarly and tools to spoof other devices.
Whether you are under pressure to have perfectly clean copy, or you need to employ powerful digital verification techniques, Google Chrome’s extensions are your best friend.Ĭhrome extensions are simple plugins that you add to your Chrome browser that increase functionality. The internet is a journalist’s greatest tool, but also it can be a minefield of false leads and traps that can destroy your reputation. It may be some time yet before fans will see Canon’s version of a true flagship in a mirrorless body.Google Chrome is an excellent browser for journalism due to its advanced customisation options and extensions The confirmation that the R3 will feature 24-megapixels further solidifies that it is Canon’s answer to the Alpha 9, not the Alpha 1.
There is room for both classes of camera to exist from multiple manufacturers. The R3 was likely to, at best, compete with the Sony Alpha 9 line, and sports photographers actually prefer the lower resolution because it allows them to have faster workflows with media outlets that do not require more resolution for web or print news. As shown by its name, the R3 may be a sports-focused camera, but it was not going to be Canon’s highest-end mirrorless model - that is reserved for the one-series line. It was trendy to immediately compare the R3 to Sony’s flagship Alpha 1 camera without knowing full specifications or waiting for a public release of the camera, but such a comparison was not particularly fair (just as those who compare the R5 to the Alpha 1 are not particularly fair either). This makes a lot of sense, as too heavy of restrictions on the camera’s use would make it difficult for testers to make use of any of the images they capture for events they are covering. In speaking to PetaPixel, Cable said that he was not instructed by Canon to scrub the EXIF data from any photos he uploaded to his blog, and presumably, that means the company also gave him permission to upload as many as he liked while covering the Olympics. While the company has publicly stated other major hardware features like eye-control autofocus, supposed low light performance, new autofocus detection modes, and the fact that the sensor would be an in-house backside-illuminated design, the actual resolution remained a mystery. Its resolution is one of the few major specifications that Canon did not share about the R3 in either the initial development announcement or the follow-up that came two months later.